The Galgotias University robot row has sparked widespread debate online after professor Neha Singh showcased a robotic dog at the India AI Impact Summit, claiming it was developed by her institution. The controversy quickly went viral on social media, drawing scrutiny over the robot’s origins and raising questions about academic representation and transparency.
Amid the backlash, Neha Singh’s “Open To Work” LinkedIn profile picture also began trending, further amplifying the discussion surrounding the incident.
Galgotias University Robot Row Sparks AI Summit Controversy
The Galgotias University robot row began when Neha Singh, a professor at the Greater Noida-based university, presented a robotic dog named Orion at the India AI Impact Summit. In a video that circulated widely online, she stated that the robot had been developed by the Centre of Excellence at Galgotias University.
However, social media users soon identified the robot as the Unitree Go2 — a product manufactured by Chinese company Unitree Robotics. The revelation triggered sharp criticism and allegations of misrepresentation.
Following the controversy, organisers reportedly asked Galgotias University to vacate its stall at Bharat Mandapam, and the power supply to its exhibit was cut off.
University Issues Apology After Backlash
As the Galgotias University robot row escalated, the university issued an official apology, stating that Neha Singh had been “ill-informed” about the robot’s technical origins.
According to the university’s statement, Singh was not authorised to speak to the press and shared incorrect information due to her enthusiasm during the interview. The institution clarified that there was no intention to misrepresent the innovation and reaffirmed its commitment to academic integrity, transparency, and responsible representation of its work.
The university also confirmed that it vacated the exhibition premises while respecting the organisers’ sentiments.
Neha Singh Responds to the Allegations
Addressing the Galgotias University robot row, Neha Singh later clarified that the institution never claimed to have manufactured the robotic dog. She explained that the robot had been introduced to students as an educational tool meant to inspire innovation.
“The controversy happened because things may not have been expressed clearly and the intent may not have been properly understood,” Singh told reporters. She added that time constraints and surrounding noise may have caused miscommunication during the interview.
Singh emphasised that the university aims to provide cutting-edge technologies in artificial intelligence to help students develop their own innovations rather than claim ownership of existing products.
Who Is Neha Singh?
Neha Singh serves as the Head of the Department of Communication at Galgotias University and has been associated with the institution since November 2023, according to her LinkedIn profile.
Prior to joining Galgotias University, she worked as an assistant professor at Sharda University in Greater Noida. Singh holds a Master of Business Administration degree from Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya in Indore and completed her undergraduate studies at the University of Allahabad.
Her “Open To Work” LinkedIn picture gained widespread attention online during the Galgotias University robot row, though it remains unclear whether the image was recently updated or previously posted.
Government Response to Misrepresentation Claims
The Galgotias University robot row also prompted a response from government officials. IT Secretary Krishnan stated that authorities would not tolerate exhibits being presented as original innovations if they were not.
He stressed that misleading claims could lead to unnecessary controversy and undermine public trust in institutions showcasing technological advancements.
The incident highlights growing scrutiny around innovation claims and responsible representation at major technology events, particularly as artificial intelligence continues to gain prominence.
Don’t miss out on our latest news—follow us for the latest AI news, breakthroughs, and insights that matter.
The debate around the robot’s origins is a reminder of how important transparency is in the academic world, especially when it comes to AI projects. With such high stakes in AI development, credibility and trust are key!
Absolutely. Transparency in AI research is essential for credibility, trust, and accountability—especially in academic institutions.