Meta is officially kicking off LlamaCon, its first-ever AI developer conference, today at its Menlo Park headquarters. The goal? Win back developers and boost enthusiasm around its open-source Llama AI models.
But the timing is critical—and complicated.
Just a year ago, Meta’s Llama family was a darling in the open AI ecosystem. Now, it’s struggling to keep pace with competitors like OpenAI, DeepSeek, and Alibaba’s Qwen. With developer trust shaken and the hype around Llama 4 underwhelming, LlamaCon represents a high-stakes moment for Meta’s AI ambitions.
From Hero to Hesitation: What Happened to Llama?
Meta stunned the AI world last year with Llama 3.1 405B, a model that rivaled GPT-4o and offered true flexibility. It was hailed as one of the most capable open models available, even earning praise from developers at AGI House and beyond.
But things changed quickly with Llama 4.
Despite Meta’s promises, the Llama 4 lineup didn’t deliver the edge developers expected. Benchmarks showed it lagging behind new entrants like DeepSeek’s R1 and V3, and even older Meta models like Llama 3.3 still get more downloads on Hugging Face.
Jeff Boudier, Head of Product at Hugging Face, confirmed that Llama 3.3 remains more popular than Llama 4, a sign that developers haven’t bought into the upgrade.
Trust Issues: The Maverick Controversy
Llama 4’s rollout was also marred by what many called benchmarking “shenanigans.” Meta showcased an unreleased variant of its Llama 4 model, Llama 4 Maverick, on the LM Arena leaderboard. Optimized for “conversationality,” this version performed far better than the model that was actually released.
This discrepancy wasn’t made clear at the time, leading to criticism from the open-source community.
“It’s a little bit of a loss of trust with the community,” said Ion Stoica, LM Arena co-founder and UC Berkeley professor.
Where’s the Reasoning?
In another surprising move, Meta released Llama 4 without a dedicated reasoning model—a now-standard component among leading labs like OpenAI and Google. Reasoning models are essential for tasks requiring logic, step-by-step thinking, and accurate problem solving.
Meta has teased a reasoning model for Llama 4, but hasn’t committed to a release date. Many see this as a missed opportunity—and possibly a rushed launch.
“Why couldn’t [Meta] wait to do that?” asked Nathan Lambert, a researcher at Ai2. “It seems like normal company weirdness.”
The Stakes Are Higher Than Ever
While LlamaCon is being framed as a developer-focused event, its real goal is strategic. Meta needs to:
- Rebuild trust with the developer community
- Showcase real innovation in Llama’s next models
- Prove it can still lead the open-source frontier
AI researcher Ravid Shwartz-Ziv noted that for Meta to regain leadership, it must start taking more technical risks and embrace new training methods—something that has been lacking lately.
But internal challenges may stand in the way. Meta’s VP of AI Research, Joelle Pineau, just announced her departure, and past reports describe the company’s AI research division as “dying a slow death.”
The Bigger Picture: Open vs Closed AI
While Meta doubled down on open models, rivals like OpenAI and Google have capitalized on commercial APIs and closed, fine-tuned systems. Meanwhile, other “open” labs like DeepSeek and Alibaba are releasing leaner, more powerful models that rival or surpass Meta’s latest efforts.
Notably, Alibaba’s Qwen 3 models, launched just a day before LlamaCon, reportedly outperform OpenAI and Google on coding benchmarks like Codeforces, raising the competitive bar once again.
Can LlamaCon Deliver?
LlamaCon is Meta’s big chance to demonstrate that it’s still a force in the AI model wars. It must do more than announce tools—it must inspire confidence.
If the company fails to deliver meaningful updates, especially around reasoning, model performance, and developer experience, Meta risks losing its grip on the very developers who made Llama successful in the first place.
Get the Latest AI News on AI Content Minds Blog